CITY PLANNING FILE NUMBER

08 192870 WET 06 OZ
Send content, including photos, you want posted on blog to tz.smith@sympatico.ca
Publicly comment on any post by clicking "comments"
Please contact jemcain@gmail.com if you want to be added or removed from the e-mail distribution list for 51 Lake Shore Drive
This blog was set up by neighbours concerned about development on this site. There is currently a proposal to build seven four storey units (six semis and one single) that would greatly reduce public views of the lake, is partially on green space and lakeside "hazardous lands" and is totally out of character with the neighbourhood. This would require a huge amendment to Toronto's Official Plan and zoning by-laws.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

DUNPAR 'SLAPP'S RESIDENTS WITH MILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT


On July 5th, some community members submitted objections to Dunpar’s application for absolute title to a sizable amount of waterfront land on the site beyond the land described in the survey that came with the developer’s title when the property was bought.  They feel strongly that this land, described as open space parkland on City zoning maps, is public land and should not just be given automatically to the developer, at least not without an adequate explanation of what looks like a virtually undefended land grab of public property. (Here is a link to one of the objections.)
The City says it has no claim on it (yet inexplicably identifies it as parkland!) and it looks like the Province has settled for a claim on what amounts to little more than the rocks at the waterline! Both jurisdictions have increased public waterfront access as policy!!
The community members expected that their objections, in the absence of objections from the City and the Province, would lead to a public airing of the issue and an explanation from Dunpar as to why they should be given the land and under whose authority.  The community expected answers from the developer, a sincere attempt at resolving the objections by the developer’s counsel and a public hearing at the Land Registry.
Instead, Dunpar’s lawyers informed the objectors that a legal action has been initiated against them at the Ontario Supreme Court of Justice for what they claim is willful obstruction to the developer’s endeavours and that damages to the amount of one million dollars will be sought.  The lawyers have told the objectors that if they withdraw their objections the lawsuit will be dropped.  Some of the objectors have, under duress, decided to withdraw their objections in the face of this threat.
This amounts to blatant intimidation by a developer with deep pockets in order to limit public participation in the planning of their community in order to get what they want.  This practice by powerful developers to muzzle opposition has become so common that it now has its own term – SLAPP  - Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation.  (A Google search of this term will describe its chilling effect on communities and the efforts by some North American jurisdictions to outlaw the practice.  Here is a link to a recent article in the Globe and Mail about it.)
The adversarial and non-communicative approach taken by John Zanini, owner of Dunpar, to resolve development issues on this site with the community needs to stop.

3 comments:

  1. This is giving me sleepless nights and the lawyers for Zanini will not accept a letter from any of us withdrawing our objection but state unless we sign a form that says:

    "I HEREBY CONFIRM THAT I WITHDRAW MY PREVIOUS OBJECTION WITH RESPECT TO THIS MATTER. I CONFIRM THAT I HAVE NO OBJECTIONS TO THE APPLICATION OF JOHN ZANINI."

    Unless we sign that form they will pursue the lawsuit against us.

    The second sentence on the form is NOT True. I don’t want to sign a legal document that is a lie.

    I have objections to Zanini’s application.

    John Zanini could have avoided the OMB and this lawsuit by working with the community.

    Instead he has chosen to bully his neighbours.
    He should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This latest tactic needs to be made public and the developer exposed for his total disregard of a neighbourhood he has made himself part of. This reminds me of the bully in the school yard that threatens to beat the kid up if they tell! Fact: interested parties followed a democratic, established process to express their objections and opinion. Fact: what the interested parties are arguing, is documented within and supported by the city's official plan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why don't you morons grow up? It's amazing how the lower class (yourselves) like to fight all development without a real cause.
    I recommend that you stop fighting this credible developer and focus on your own menial lives. What's equally amazing to me is that this development will enhance the area aesthetically and your property values will increase!
    I guess you're just the same bunch of losers who would probably be OK with a big new rental high rise on Lakeshore Promenade.
    Perhaps one day you'll figure yourselves out...but I won't hold me breath.

    ReplyDelete